1. |
It does not make sense to extract dioxane within neighborhoods
that are distant from the original site of contamination when
the core areas and adjacent public and/or commercial areas
have not been successfully addressed. |
2. |
Pumping a probable carcinogen from deep underground to within
a few feet of the surface within a residential area could
be hazardous to the health and welfare of our families. |
3. |
We are not convinced that the integrity of the pipeline system
that would carry this carcinogen could be adequately guaranteed
(i.e. leaks, damages during future road/sewer work, etc.) |
4. |
The scientific basis for “leading edge” remediation
is questionable, especially within a highly populated residential
area. |
5. |
Similar “leading edge” solutions already utilized
in the Evergreen neighborhood have been largely ineffective. |
6 |
We categorically oppose the loss of private property owners’
rights as part of any remedial alternative. |